🔗 Share this article

We are in Black History Month in the United Kingdom, and it appears it’s time for a reassessment. Throughout its history, an event that began as a commemorative event of history, culture and the connections between Black populations worldwide, has taken on a commercial tone, broadening to incorporate events where individuals of African heritage are paid to address Caucasian groups about hidden biases and supportive partnership. The 2020s Black Lives Matter protests created a surge in the enterprise of showcasing anti-racist commitment. But even that moment has passed. The wave has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what promoting consciousness is for.

The Background of Black History Month

First commemorated in the America and its northern neighbor, Black History Month was established in 1962 as a week dedicated to Negro history by African American historian Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month evolved from this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the North America in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the Britain, Deutschland, Éire and the Netherlands.

The month has evolved since its inception, placing less emphasis on the histories of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and increasingly on prominent Black figures in politics, culture, and activism, and broadly celebrating the impact Black people have made to shape the country. It is in learning environments where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the way the month is celebrated is a manifestation of the current political situation. How it evolves is a good lesson in how co-option leads to dismantling: the transformation of Black History Month has impeded the point of it, which is to confront structural and organizational discrimination.

---

A Jarring Moment

Few things illustrate how crucial it is to reconsider Black History Month as much as the specific period in which it falls this year. In the UK, a reemerging right-wing in the guise of the Reform political group is ahead in surveys. In the recent season we observed the biggest extreme right demonstration in the history of Britain. Kemi Badenoch, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a staunch adversary of anti-racism activism, and we are in a place where a elected representative feels empowered to state that a lack of white people in specific city neighborhoods is a reason for concern. Meanwhile, extreme conservative groups are growing in the European continent as a complete entity.

In the America, a significant offensive against DEI and affirmative action has been taken, often successfully, to the top legal institutions of the country. A drive to erase the history of people of color and legacy from the records is in progress. One of the political figure's first executive orders aimed at the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, accusing them of a “concerted and widespread effort to change the national past” by portraying America “as inherently racist”.

Given these circumstances, the observance illustrates how little it can be impactful if it is limited to either dutiful corporate observances, or stripped of political content festivities of contributions in the past, rather than addressing the situation of the contemporary world. It also reveals how its limited duration means that it is disconnected from the more extensive continuous action that is necessary. A university professor, a educator at an educational institution, articulated it most accurately when she voiced worries about the short-term symbolic gestures of the celebration. “The issue with adopting a symbolic stance”, she commented, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month evolves into a fleeting performance rather than a agent of progress.”

---

Reevaluating, Not Abandoning

Establishing how to adjust, modify and expand initiatives for fair treatment and appreciation in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just discontinue observances such as Black History Month altogether, thinking they are inadequate for current needs, or are remnants of an era that has not worked.

However, regardless of the situation, Black History Month, and in fact the entire extended network and tradition of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, diversity equity and inclusion initiatives, and indeed, including corporate presentations – constitute an foundation that a significant effort has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the political landscape shifts (and in fact, declines), but to be a living breathing thing.

So what would a contemporary active Black History Month appear as? Firstly, it would be not just one concentrated month: something that is spread out through the year (as certain organizations are already beginning to do), parts of its content (particularly around prominent figures of color) incorporated into educational programs. It would also be a time that does not shy away from politics, and provides room for people, particularly young people, to air their fears and experiences. What use is basic knowledge of the history when it doesn’t reckon with the contemporary truth of far-right rallies in the urban areas? Organizations who celebrate it should not be pacified with the passive language of “unconscious bias” and alertness to subtle slights, but faced with the risks that impact society if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. Briefly stated, Black History Month should be made up-to-date, pressing, and reactive. Maybe an total re-identification is necessary – Contemporary Black History Month.